Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics
and Science Action ResearchConceptual Frame
|
Definition of Action Research |
Action research is the process of systematically evaluating the
consequences of educational decisions and adjusting practice to maximize
effectiveness (McLean, 1995).
The process is situation-specific,
cyclical, and ongoing, with the results from one cycle leading to
further action research.
|
|
Central Ideas in Action Research |
-
I am the central
person in my research.
-
I am asking a
real question about a real issue, and I am hoping to move towards a
solution.
-
I am starting
from where I am.
-
I am trying to
bring about some improvement. (McNiff, Lomax, & Whitehead,1996)
|
|
Rationale for Developing Proficiency in
Action Research |
The process of action research supports:
-
strategic
problem solving for specific educational challenges;
-
positive
communication between administrators and teachers;
-
empowerment of
teachers and administrators;
-
increased
professional satisfaction;
-
flexible,
solution-oriented thinking;
-
increased
professional motivation to improve practice;
-
increased
collegiality, on-going inquiry, self-reflection, and decision making
skills;
-
increased
expectations for student learning;
-
increased
expectations for self-improvement.
According to Osterman and Kottkamp
(1993), the following are reasons for engaging in action research:
-
Everyone needs
professional growth opportunities.
-
All professionals
want to improve.
-
All professionals
can learn.
-
All
professionals are capable of assuming responsibility for their own
professional growth and development.
-
People need and
want information about their own performance.
-
Collaboration
enriches professional development. (p. 46)
|
|
The Goal of Action Research |
Those engaging in action research aim “...to take action and effect
positive educational change in the specific school environment that was
studied...with the goals of gaining insight, developing reflective
practice, effecting positive changes in the school environment (and on
educational practices in general), and improving student outcomes and
the lives of those involved.” (Mills, 2000, pp.5-6)
|
|
Validity of Action Research
|
High
validity when results are applied in the situation in which action
research was conducted, but low validity when trying to broadly
generalize. Validity also depends upon proper use of action research
procedures.
|

References
Calhoun, E. (1994). How to use action
research in the self-renewing school. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McLean, J. E. (1995). Improving education
through action research: A guide for administrators and teachers.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996).
You and your action research project. London: Hyde Publications.
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A
guide for the teacher researcher. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993).
Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional
development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Resources:
emTech's page on Action Research:
http://www.emtech.net/actionresearch.htm
|